Energy Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
|
Ready To Roll: The Benefits Of Today’s Advanced Technology Vehicles For Oregon
Ready_To_Roll.pdf
|
Executive Summary
Despite tighter federal air pollution
limits for automobiles over
the last three decades, Oregon’s
fleet of automobiles produces more global
warming pollution than ever before,
and toxic air pollution continues to
threaten Oregonians’ health. Increasing
the use of advanced technologies and
advanced technology vehicles would
drastically cut Oregon’s global warming
pollution and help alleviate both toxic
and smog-forming air pollution, while
enhancing Oregon’s energy security and
boosting the state’s economy.
Policies such as the Clean Cars program,
which establishes standards for
global warming pollution and toxic air
pollution from new cars and light trucks
and also requires the sale of low- and
near-zero-emission vehicles, will help
bring increased numbers of advanced
technology vehicles to the state.
Automakers’ continued dependence on
old and inefficient technologies is causing
unnecessary levels of global warming
pollution, toxic air pollution, and
dependence on a volatile energy supply.
These problems pose serious threats to
Oregon’s environment, public health,
and economy.
• The transportation sector, including
cars and light trucks, is responsible for
38% of Oregon’s carbon dioxide emissions
which is the primary form of
global warming pollution in Oregon.
Global warming already threatens
Oregon’s environment. Scientists have
measured a 50% decline in Cascades
snowpack since the 1950s, reducing
summer river flows and disrupting the
state’s water cycle. If current trends
continue, pollution from cars and
trucks will reach levels 31% higher
than 1990 levels by 2020. Scientists estimate that we must reduce pollution
to 75% below 1990 levels by
2050 in order to avoid the most disastrous
effects of global warming (pg.
10).
• Motor vehicles are a major source of
toxic air pollution in Oregon. Every
Oregon county has six or more toxic
pollutants present in the air at levels
that exceed EPA health benchmarks.
High concentrations of air toxics such
as benzene, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde
raise Oregon residents’ cancer
risk above federal health goals statewide
(pg. 12).
• Oregon’s over-reliance on petroleum
for transportation leaves the state susceptible
to rising prices, price spikes
and supply disruptions, and sends
millions of dollars out of state in unnecessary
fuel costs. Oregonians spend
roughly $11.75 million dollars on
gasoline every day, and nearly $4.3
billion annually. Because Oregon has
no oil production or gasoline refining
capacity in state, the majority of the
profits from gasoline sales accrue to
companies outside of Oregon, hurting
Oregon’s economy and leaving less
money in the hands its consumers and
businesses. These problems will become
more severe over the next several
decades as global petroleum
supplies tighten and prices rise (pg.
14).
There are advanced technology vehicles––
and advanced technologies for
conventional vehicles––that can alleviate
these problems. While the technologies
are “ready to roll,” their availability in
Oregon is limited.
• Clean conventional vehicles:
Automakers can make every car and
truck in their fleet produce significantly
less global warming pollution
by using advanced technologies already
in existence, such as advanced
transmissions, direct-injection engines,
and improved aerodynamics. Many of
these improvements to make cars
cleaner could also significantly increase
fuel efficiency, enhancing
Oregon’s energy security and
economy. In addition, fourteen
automakers now manufacture conventional
vehicles that meet California’s
rigorous partial Zero Emission Vehicle
(PZEV) emission standards that significantly
reduce toxic air pollutants.
However, many of these vehicles are
available only to consumers in states
that have adopted the Clean Cars program
(pg. 20).
• Hybrid-electric vehicles: Americans
purchased 93,000 hybrid cars in the
first six months of 2005, more than
they purchased in all of 2004. Sales
took off in late summer as gas prices
rose. As many as 60 percent of potential
vehicle buyers surveyed state that
they would consider buying a hybrid,
yet some Oregon auto dealers report
waiting lists for the popular Toyota
Prius hybrid. Hybrid-electric technology
can cut global warming pollution
from cars by one-third, as well as provide
substantial reductions in toxic air
emissions (pg. 26).
• Other types of advanced technology
vehicles––such as–battery-electric vehicles
and–“plug-in” hybrids––also
show the potential for significant environmental
benefits, including zero or near-zero emissions of toxic and global
warming pollution (provided they
are charged from a clean source of
electricity). However, the auto industry
must move these technologies to
market more aggressively to make
them available to the general public
(pg. 36)
• Fuel-cell vehicles also offer significant
potential for zero or near-zero emissions.
But this promise only holds true
if the hydrogen is generated from renewable
resources; current federal investment
is geared toward fossil-fuel
and nuclear sources of hydrogen.
There are also substantial infrastructure
investment obstacles that must be
overcome before hydrogen fuel-cell
cars will be a broadly viable solution
(pg. 38)
Adopting the Clean Cars program will
put tens of thousands of advanced technology
cars, light trucks, and SUVs on
Oregon’s roads by the end of the decade,
at minimal additional cost to automakers
and a net benefit to consumers. The
Clean Cars program’s advanced technology
vehicle requirements and its pollution
standards will cut global warming
and toxic air pollution from cars and
light trucks.
• The Clean Cars program’s “Zero
Emission Vehicle” requirements will
result in sales of approximately 7,000
hybrid-electric vehicles and 30,500
ultra clean conventional gasolinepowered
vehicles in Oregon in 2008
(when model year 2009 vehicles go on
sale), with the numbers increasing
over time (pg. 45).
• By 2016, the standards will reduce
global warming pollution from new
cars by 34 percent and from new light
trucks by 25 percent. These cuts will
reduce total global warming pollution
from Oregon’s cars and light trucks
12% below projected levels by 2020,
the equivalent of removing 350,000
cars from Oregon’s roads. (pg. 50)
• The air quality standards in the Clean
Cars program will provide a 5 percent
reduction in emissions of volatile organic
compounds, including toxic air
pollutants that threaten Oregonians
health, over federal standards by
2020. Nitrogen oxide emissions will
be reduced an additional 11 percent
beyond cuts achieved by federal standards.
(pg. 48)
• The Clean Cars Program will also ensure
a consistent supply of clean vehicles
for Oregon’s consumers, create
economies of scale to drive down
costs, provide enough vehicles to allow
the construction of alternativefuel
infrastructure, set high standards
for vehicle technology, and help guide the development of even cleaner automotive
technologies in the years to
come. (pg. 46)
The Clean Cars program will provide
a net benefit to consumers and businesses
who purchase cars and auto manufacturers
will only incur minimal costs.
• The global warming pollution standards
will provide a net benefit from
the Clean Cars program for consumers.
Because the cleaner cars will be
less expensive to operate, the projected
increase in the up front cost of new
vehicles will be more than offset by
decreased operating costs. When the
program is fully implemented, vehicle
owners in Oregon will experience a
collective net savings of $8 million
annually (p. 53).
• Producing vehicles to meet the airquality
and Zero-Emission Vehicle
targets would cost automakers approximately
$11.5 million in model
year 2009. The incremental cost of the
program in model year 2009 represents
0.038 percent of automakers
profits in 2004. These costs will be
offset by financial benefits for
automakers because the technological
improvements can be exported to
other vehicle lines and can assist in
complying with other regulatory standards.
(p. 51).
The goals of the Clean Cars program
are attainable and achieving them would
be beneficial to Oregon.
|