Most of the student groups appealing their Programs Finance Committee
allocations for the 2007-08 school year left their appeal hearings with
a little more money, but not everyone was happy.
On
Thursday, the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Queer Alliance came to
the hearing to request an extra $266 to fund its "Transgender Day of
Remembrance." Members said the event is a day to commemorate the lives
of transgendered people who have been murdered.
The PFC
originally allocated $84 for the event, which Opey Freedle, the board
representative for the Oregon Student Equal Rights Alliance, said is
not even enough to purchase candles for a vigil.
Freedle called
the $84 allocation "crumbs" and said that at the original budget
hearing, at which the group received a 2.33 percent budget decrease,
the PFC told the LGBTQA it should be privileged to not get a bigger cut.
"I
reject that," Freedle said. "You've afforded us $84 to remember the
lives of people who have been killed. This is a community that doesn't
have privilege."
In the original budget hearing, the LGBTQA
received a budget decrease because it did not spend enough of its money
in the 2005-06 school year.
LGBTQA representative Kawa Kuller
said that the unspent money was due to a speaker canceling at the last
minute for an event held at the end of May. She said that at the
original hearing, the point was made that if the speaker had not
canceled, the group would have spent the money and would not have had
to take a budget decrease.
Kuller said the speaker's cancellation was beyond the group's control.
LGBTQA
Director John Joo said that the PFC broke "viewpoint neutrality" in the
original budget hearing when PFC members told the group that the
Multicultural Center also had a speaker cancel at the last minute and
was still penalized for not spending that money.
Student Senator
Erica Reiko Anderson, who attended the hearing, said that she was on
last year's PFC and said that since there has been no official rule set
over what to do for groups whose speakers cancel, the PFC should make
decisions for the individual groups and not base allocations on what
happened with other programs.
"This group is not the MCC," she said. "I don't know what happened with the MCC and frankly, I don't care."
Anderson said that the LGBTQA could file grievances against the PFC for basing its budget on what happened with other groups.
PFC
Chairman Oscar Guerra said that as chairman, he would take
responsibility for letting other PFC members bring up other groups
during budget hearings.
"I've been lenient on that," he said.
Guerra said that if a grievance is filed, it should be against him.
LGBTQA
members reminded the PFC several more times that if the group's speaker
had not canceled in May, it would have spent all its money. They also
reiterated the importance of Transgender Day of Remembrance. Members of
the group became emotional during their presentations.
"It's not
that we're asking for the money for a social event," Freedle said,
raising his voice. "It's about education and the celebration of lives
of people who have been murdered. It's not even a queer issue, it's a
people issue."
Student Heather Haggard told the PFC that this event is a human rights issue.
"This event is going to affect my experiences at the University," Haggard said before she became choked up and sat down.
Guerra told the group that while the PFC is willing to look at other factors, it is under restraints this year.
"It
is unfortunately a year where not everyone will receive their request,"
he said. "It's not that this body is saying, 'We don't like this line
item.'"
In the end, the PFC voted by a 3-2-2 margin to give a
small increase and changed the amount for the Transgender Day of
Remembrance from $84 to $150.
"It's not a lot," said PFC member Chii-San SunOwen. "It's like another crumb. Hopefully it's one that will help."
PFC members Bassel Menzalji and Matt Rose voted against the motion. Guerra abstained and Vice Chairman Micah Kosasa was absent.
OSPIRG
Also
on Thursday, the Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group, which
had previously been given no increase, requested a 7.8 percent
increase, but left with only 1.5 percent - a $1,681 increase over the
current budget.
In its original budget hearing, a line item was omitted from the budget
PFC members were looking at. This item was for insurance, rent and
utilities, some of which pay for the University office, and the rest
pays for the Portland office.
PFC member Wannita Nualngam said she didn't like the idea of student money going to pay for an office off campus.
OSPIRG said the people who work in the Portland office spend their time lobbying - something students are too busy to do.
Linguistics
group GLOSS appealed its budget allocation, which the PFC decreased by
29 percent - more than twice the decrease recommended by the ASUO
Executive - at the original hearing because the group failed to
fundraise and had not spent its entire allocation the previous year.
The group is funded in part by the linguistics department, which gives
$2,000 for an annual speaker series. The PFC changed its original
allocation of $549 to the Executive recommendation and decreased the
group's budget by 13.3 percent, giving GLOSS a final allocation of $686.
The
International Law Students Association, whose primary purpose is to
publish two annual law journals, was recalled because the PFC illegally
decreased the group's budget by more than 25 percent without a
unanimous vote. The group was punished because it spent only 22 percent
of its budget in 2005-06. The group's director, Elijah Van Camp,
explained that the group was unable to spend its journal budget because
it was finalizing contract negotiations with a publisher.
"I'm asking the PFC not to punish our group for making a good decision at a bad time," Van Camp said.
The
group no longer needs to pay to publish the journals so had hoped to
spend its PFC allocation for the journal on a symposium, which Van Camp
said will bring the journal more prestigious articles.
The
group is holding a symposium this year and currently has the line item
in its budget, which Van Camp mentioned in his presentation will be
March 16.
The PFC decided to decrease the group's budget by 13.9 percent, a $450 difference. The final allocation was $2,788.
At
Friday's meeting, the Black Law Students Association appeared for an
initial budget hearing. Because the group had turned in its budget
late, it had its hearing moved to the very end of the budget cycle. The
PFC gave the group a 2.57 percent increase, which is a $30 difference
over this year's budget.
Also on Friday, the ASUO Constitution
Court requested an increase in the amount of stipends it receives, but
the PFC said that Chief Justice Matt Greene did not bring any new
information - a requirement for having an appeal heard - and voted
against hearing the appeal.